On June 30, 2025, the Rabat Court of Appeals upheld the initial ruling against journalist Hamid Mahdaoui. The court sentenced Mahdaoui to 18 months in prison and imposed a substantial fine of 1.5 million Moroccan dirhams (approximately 150,000 euros) in favor of Justice Minister Abdellatif Ouahbi.
### Background of the Case
The case dates back to November 2024, when the primary court found Mahdaoui guilty of disseminating false allegations aimed at defaming individuals, a ruling based on articles 443, 444, and 447 of the Moroccan Penal Code. This judgment followed complaints filed by Minister Ouahbi, who submitted five grievances against Mahdaoui with the approval of Prime Minister Aziz Akhannouch. While the minister’s defense sought 10 million dirhams in civil damages, the primary court reduced this amount to 1.5 million dirhams, a decision upheld by the appellate court.
### Reactions and Opinions
The ruling has sparked significant debate within media and human rights circles. Critics argue that the decision represents an attempt to restrict press freedom and silence dissenting voices. Mahdaoui, known for his critical stance and bold coverage of political and social issues, has previously faced legal challenges, including imprisonment from 2017 to 2020 for his reporting on protests in the Rif region, making him a symbol of independent journalism for many.
Conversely, supporters of the ruling contend that Mahdaoui overstepped the bounds of free expression, arguing that his allegations against Minister Ouahbi were unfounded and warranted legal consequences. This division highlights the ongoing tension between press freedom and legal accountability in Morocco.
### Impact on Press Freedom
The case of Hamid Mahdaoui is indicative of the challenges journalists face in Morocco. Advocates for press freedom argue that employing criminal law instead of press law in such instances threatens freedom of expression. The significant financial penalty raises concerns about potential misuse of the judicial system to exert pressure on independent journalists, particularly those lacking financial or institutional support.
Moreover, the prior withdrawal of Mahdaoui’s press credentials is viewed as part of systematic pressure intended to curtail his media activities. This has drawn criticisms from international human rights organizations, which call for respect for press freedom and a safe environment for journalists.
### Future Implications
With the confirmation of the appellate ruling, it is anticipated that the case will continue to provoke discussions about the balance of laws governing freedom of expression in Morocco. It may also affect the relationship between authorities and the media, especially amid the political and social challenges faced by the country. Mahdaoui and his supporters, including human rights organizations, are expected to appeal the ruling or seek legal avenues to contest the verdict.
Source
